Opinionated Thought

Opinions... Everybody has one, What's Yours?

Blog Sections

Banner
Banner
Home New Users

Confessions of a Gay Weapon of Marital Destruction

E-mail

Politics - Social Issues

User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 

I broke up Al and Tipper Gore. And Sandra Bullock and Jesse James. No, I am not a 50-something masseuse or a tattoo model with a thing for Nazi outfits. I'm just a gay man who's about to celebrate his second wedding anniversary. Apparently, my marriage is a menace. According to the Family Research Council, "Gay marriage threatens the institutions of marriage and the family." (See a photographic history of the gay rights movement.)

For the past two years, I've tried to deny it. But faced with the prospect of even more finger-pointing in the wake of U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker's Aug. 4 ruling against California's Prop 8, I've decided to come out and come clean. I'm claiming the pinko-threat label and wearing it with pride, like the Miss California USA tiara that Carrie Prejean wore until someone leaked those eight videos of her touching her pro-opposite-marriage private parts. Yes, I am responsible for the sorry state marriage is in. The Gores' "shocking" split was no surprise to me. Blame me for breaking America's sweetest heart. (I'd like to take credit for Bristol Palin and Levi Johnston's off-again engagement, but honestly, who except Bristol didn't see that coming?) Jenny and Mark "Appalachian Trail" Sandford, Mel and Robyn Gibson, Speidi - I put them all asunder. I'm here. I'm a home wrecker. Get used to it. Is there hope for the American marriage?

I'm an anti-nuclear-family activist. I think I was born this way. Just ask my divorced-after-four-decades parents. I'd been working on them for what seems like a lifetime. Since they unleashed me on state-sanctioned nuptials in 1966, the U.S. divorce rate has nearly doubled. Gay apologists may say the culprit is the rise of no-fault divorce. But this is America, damn it, and someone somewhere must be at fault. That someone is me.

Real Americans agree that I'm dangerous. In "Gathering Storm," an ad produced by the National Organization for Marriage, a paid actress - but no doubt still a real American - with Sue Sylvester's haircut says I want to change the way she lives. Larry "Wide Stance" Craig voted to amend the Constitution to save the nation from my unholy matrimony. The thrice-divorced Rush Limbaugh warned that "gay marriage would destroy the American family." And, of course, what about the children? I am incapable of "providing a safe and secure and emotionally stable environment" for them, said Family Research Council co-founder George "Rentboy.com" Rekers.

I must admit, though, that the thrill is fading. It's getting too easy. Larry King is on his seventh shot at wedded bliss, and I've had a pretty good record with the Best Actress Oscar winners. I want to move on to pre-emptive attacks. I should try getting a proposition passed to ban ugly marriages. Surely the state has a legitimate interest in keeping the hideous from going forth, not to mention multiplying, and I'm sure I could get at least 51% of voters to agree with me. Those who say California's gay-marriage ban should stand make a completely logical point: majority rule should always trump minority rights - activist judges and their equal protection clause be damned. I mean, what the unattractive do behind closed doors is O.K., I guess, but I don't want to have to see it. And I certainly don't want my tax dollars to promote the homely lifestyle.

Or should I just let them be? If two repellent people want to wake up next to each other every the morning for the rest of their lives, it might turn my stomach, but is it really any of my business? It must be hard enough for them to get through the day - there are reflective surfaces everywhere - without having the federal government against them. Allowing dog-faced marriage doesn't mean I love my husband any less, and banning unsightly unions wouldn't give me a better chance at till death do us part. So relax, ugly people; you're free to pursue happiness with the appearance-challenged person of your choice. Love is love, after all, and that's beautiful enough.

Bookmark with:

Deli.cio.us    Digg    reddit    Facebook    StumbleUpon    Newsvine
Trackback(0)
Comments (1)add comment
Interestingly Enough..
written by Morgan Hill , August 08, 2010

After partying all weekend and paying the price all day I ran across this interesting article. Laced with enough satire to lament my own sarcastic abilities into beginner status, this particular article found my eyes on the eve of an intense gay marriage debate between myself and my date at the time. Ironically I was entranced in a first date with a beautiful woman when a couple of men quite enjoying each others company sat next to us in the lounge. Her repulsed response was enough to ignite interesting conversation for the entire evening. (Really I should have known better, about both the date, and the debate.)
report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +0


Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy

Banner
Banner

Recent Comments

great writing
I thoroughly enjoy the article. I have studied human nature for some time now and agree wi...
Mark Rovell

Interestingly Enough..
After partying all weekend and paying the price all day I ran across this interesting arti...
Morgan Hill

The Answer is No.
The answer to the title question is No.
Admin

This article has allot of fact to it
I have a few clients now that fall squarely under that number 4 column... AND THEY ARE NOT...
Morgan Hill

Reason why I stopped posting
For me, I got discouraged when all my You Tube vids that I uploaded on this site and wrote...
Clifford Scott Carson

633521625742105111-hypocrisy.jpg

Polls

If you could find out the exact moment of your death, Would you want to know?