Opinionated Thought

Opinions... Everybody has one, What's Yours?

Blog Sections

Banner
Banner
Home New Users

LOST HORIZON (1973) Burt Bacharach classic due for DVD release

E-mail

Entertainment - Movies

User Rating: / 9
PoorBest 
Why shouldn't PARADISE be a slightly goofy place?

The 1973 musical version of LOST HORIZON is the most wonderful endearing and campy musical films of all time. The 1973 musical remake of the James Hilton novel about mythical SHANGRI-LA! is a real special gem. Music by BURT BACHARACH and lyrics by HAL David. A strange mixture of straight drama, adventure and musical sequences. It has the distinction of being the ONLY anti war musical fantasy ever filmed.

This film was a critical and financial disappointment in the United States, but made a lot of money overseas. Only in America did it fail. Highly different and unique in it's approach as a film musical, it deserves far better credit than it's given. As a story, LOST HORIZON is an incredible adventure and both the 1937 Frank Capra film and this 1973 musical are faithful adaptations of the James Hilton novel. What I like about the 1973 version is the freedom in which the musical numbers are presented. The film has a prestigious cast and a gifted director and cinematographer. This is a BURT BACHARACH Shangri-La and it's a wonderful place. Songs like THE WORLD IS A CIRCLE, SHARE THE JOY and LIVING TOGETHER, GROWING TOGETHER evoke a happiness that Hilton wrote about in his novel. Why shouldn't Shangri-La be a slightly goofy place? The two love songs, I MIGHT FRIGHTEN HER AWAY and the deleted I COME TO YOU are the sensitive spots in the picture. There's a peacefulness and soft spoken quality in both these songs that is very much keeping with the philosophy of the story. Moreover, THE THINGS I WILL NOT MISS is a good duet with a strong melody. It's a nice exchange of different types of perspective and who can fault with Olivia Hussey and Sally Kellerman stomping, singing and dancing on tables? They're a wonderful team and the number is well staged.

I always found it interesting in this story how the High Lama kidnaps someone from the outside world to take his place in Shangri-La. The character of the High Lama is a gentle soul but somewhat radical in his view of mankind as a whole. He has no hope for the world outside of Shangri-La. If this film were to be remade today, it would be interesting to see more emphasis put on the leading character, RICHARD CONWAY'S conflict with what he left behind in the outside world as opposed to what he's found in Shangri-La.

Of course, for the film to be believable, the character of RICHARD CONWAY must be presented as suffering amnesia at the end, like he was in the book. Neither film versions of LOST HORIZON were faithful to the novel in that regard. Did Conway find Shangri-La or was it imagined? Did they all die in the plane crash? Every man has his own idea of what his Shangri-La would be. The conflict with Conway wanting to believe in Shangri-La and returning to his old life in the outside world is powerful. I like the melancholy on the faces of Kellerman, Kennedy and Van as they watch their friends leave the mystical valley. Interesting how Conway doesn't want to leave paradise, but is being pressured out by his brother. Both versions of LOST HORIZON work in different ways, but both are successful in probing James Hiltons ideas of a hidden valley where money has no value and moderation is the rule. So in a sense it's anti capitalism in it's theme where as money and materialism is not the motivation. Human kindness, decency, compassion, courtesy, etiquette and living harmoniously with each other is the rule.

LOST HORIZON has a much stronger story than most musicals. It attempts to answer the basic fundamental questions of life and one can hardly fault it for not succeeding. One has to remember that LOST HORIZON in 1973 was post CABARET. It was no longer fashionable for characters to break out in song in a musical, much less to be dubbed by other singers. LOST HORIZON was an easy target for jaded critics. The expectations for it were high, almost unreasonable. There were two targets to be hit, the producer, ROSS HUNTER and BURT BACHARACH and the critics were out to get both of them. Ross Hunter had enjoyed decades of financial success as a producer and LOST HORIZON was his follow up film to his 1970 blockbuster AIRPORT That film was Universals biggest moneymaker up to that time and the success of that picture triggered a decade of disaster films. For years AIRPORT was the most watched film ever to be shown on television. It was nominated for 11 Academy Awards including Best Picture. At the time, Burt Bacharach and Hal David were the most successful songwriters in the country. The unabashed sentimentality of LOST HORIZON hardly had a chance in the wake of the breakdown of censorship in films like EASY RIDER, MIDNIGHT COWBOY and THE GODFATHER. Sex and violence was a new frontier in the late 60's and early 70's Audiences were flocking to films with content that they were not use to seeing on the screen. Lavish musicals were no longer well received no matter how well they were made. Today LOST HORIZON can be enjoyed and appreciated on several levels. It's the ultimate escapist film with a strong story, wonderful music, an expensive budget and some quirky humor. It's unconventional in the sense that the music is not introduced until 45 minutes into the film. It changes course mid way when the mystical valley is introduced and why not? LOST HORIZON '73 is a heavenly film that deserves rediscovering. A lost and legendary treasure deserving far better than it's reputation.


Bookmark with:

Deli.cio.us    Digg    reddit    Facebook    StumbleUpon    Newsvine
Trackback(0)
Comments (1)add comment
a follow up
written by Clifford Scott Carson , June 17, 2009

by Jeff Young

I'm glad to read after all these decades of trashing the 1973 version of LOST HORIZON that people have come on board to defend the movie and express admiration for it.

LOST HORIZON got panned badly by the critics back in its day. It even found a place in the books as one of the worst movie remakes in history. I strenuously disagreed then and now.

LOST HORIZON was a much better and enjoyable film than the criticism it unfairly garnered. I believed much of the sniping and ridicule came from and comes from people who are cynically uncomfortable with anything that depicts human kindness, decency, compassion, courtesy, ettiquette, and living harmoniously with each other. LOST HORIZON in all its movie incarnations portrayed that message. But there are people who don't and never will buy into the message of harmonious and happy co-existence. Such people believe life has no meaning if there is no cut-throat competition that rewards the winners with fortune, high-living, corporate promotion, the biggest house and car, while leaving the losers in the dust with nothing. Many people still believe happiness in life is equated ONLY with material success and triumph over the less capable. Some people cannot envision life where EVERYONE is happy and materialistic successful. In order to be happy in life there always has to be winners and losers. One example is the grade curve in college where there are high grade scorers and low grade scorers. Competitive students become angered if there is no grade curve to ensure there are losers.

Subsequently, LOST HORIZON (1973) was considered sentimental, sappy, wildly unrealistic, a ridiculous fantasy, and an illusion of life in Heaven on Earth. I didn't try to entertain any metaphysical or existential contemplations on LOST HORIZON. I just enjoyed it for the pleasant musical it was and the simple message of humanity at its most capable spiritually. Perhaps the cynics are right. LOST HORIZON requires human evolution to the next spiritual level. Even if this is true, at least LOST HORIZON gives us a strong vision of what it can be. Maybe living in a real Shangrila as portrayed in the movie would drive most of us nuts with boredom after a month. But I loved the message of politeness, friendliness, ettiquette, courtesy, and lack of deceit between human beings. I know there are people who considered this view a sign of weakness and submissiveness. Only the strong and rude prevail. To the strong come the rewards of wealth, women, fame, power, adulation, and vast material rewards. Yet even recent history shows people who've achieved all this are among the most unhappy and live shorter lives. To each his own.

report abuse
vote down
vote up

Votes: +7


Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy

Banner
Banner

Recent Comments

great writing
I thoroughly enjoy the article. I have studied human nature for some time now and agree wi...
Mark Rovell

Interestingly Enough..
After partying all weekend and paying the price all day I ran across this interesting arti...
Morgan Hill

The Answer is No.
The answer to the title question is No.
Admin

This article has allot of fact to it
I have a few clients now that fall squarely under that number 4 column... AND THEY ARE NOT...
Morgan Hill

Reason why I stopped posting
For me, I got discouraged when all my You Tube vids that I uploaded on this site and wrote...
Clifford Scott Carson

tifi-propertyline.jpg

Polls

If you could find out the exact moment of your death, Would you want to know?